1D-p-1H-1S
x-2S-3C
if
a. double is takeout
b. double is (mandatory) support
Page 1 of 1
how forcing?
#1
Posted 2012-October-11, 00:27
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#2
Posted 2012-October-11, 00:59
Without discussion non forcing.
With my regular partners forcing because I sacrificed my 2 NT rebid to show non forcing hands.
With my regular partners forcing because I sacrificed my 2 NT rebid to show non forcing hands.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#3
Posted 2012-October-11, 01:25
Which reminds me that this is a great place for 2NT=good 3H bid (I hope the OP will forgive my hijack).
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#4
Posted 2012-October-11, 01:51
Just competitive, in both cases. With a good hand, you start with double.
Maybe you should play transfers here?
Maybe you should play transfers here?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#5
Posted 2012-October-11, 04:24
NF of course.
2nt as hand with 6 hearts sounds interesting. 2nt as comp hand sounds bad, you want to show your suit before they bid 3s if you're weak.
2nt as hand with 6 hearts sounds interesting. 2nt as comp hand sounds bad, you want to show your suit before they bid 3s if you're weak.
#6
Posted 2012-October-11, 05:34
I doubt it.
What will work in which situation better?
What will work in which situation better?
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Page 1 of 1