The good news is, you have better trumps than partner might expect. The bad news is, you have ♦AQJ. Your bid?
Weighing the ups and downs Partner tries for grand
#1
Posted 2012-June-07, 14:35
The good news is, you have better trumps than partner might expect. The bad news is, you have ♦AQJ. Your bid?
-- Bertrand Russell
#2
Posted 2012-June-07, 14:44
duhh ... I was looking at wrong bidder .
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#3
Posted 2012-June-07, 15:22
-- Bertrand Russell
#4
Posted 2012-June-07, 15:23
I was kibitzing so know what partner has.
- hrothgar
#5
Posted 2012-June-07, 15:24
#6
Posted 2012-June-07, 15:33
Assuming 5D is voidwood, partner has taken control. I told him how many keycards I have and he's done something other than sign off.
I assume I have an agreement about the 6C bid, so you'd better tell me what it is.
If he was interested in my opinion, he wouldn't have jumped to 5D. He could (I assume) have bid 4D, or 3H (forcing raise). He didn't do any of them.
As he hasn't asked about the SQ he must be something like 6403. The ace of diamonds is thus useless and I seem to have a working 8-count in my 14-16 NT. If he isn't bidding grand himself, or asking for kings, I can't see how our hand can be what he is looking for.
If I am being asked my opinion, I seem to have an obvious sign-off: the only good thing about my hand is the doubleton club.
I could be looking at QJxx AK xxxx KQx. Now that really would be a good hand.
#7
Posted 2012-June-07, 15:36

-- Bertrand Russell
#8
Posted 2012-June-07, 15:37
Quote
I agree. Are we asked to make fully informed decision or are we asked to guess what 6C was.
In the first case I look at my system notes about 6C in 2nd case I bid the grand as w/e 6C is it must be invite to 7 looking for something specific and this specific thing could be only 3rd round value in clubs.
If partner was interested in how well my hand fit opposite shortness or specific kings or w/e he wouldn't have bid the ERKCB but splinter or some other forcing bid.
#9
Posted 2012-June-07, 16:08
6 4 0 3 ... or some such ... so he is not interested in the ♠ Q with a 10 card fit to the A K .
5NT ( next step ) would have been the ♠Q-ask.
So, 6C is K-ask ( excluding the ♦K.... you don't have any outsdide K, so the reply 6S
.... If you had the ♥K, then 6H would have been the reply .
.... If you had the ♣K, the 6NT would have been the reply
Now, since you made a point of the A Q J of Diam, the Grand is a 50% shot if partner is missing the ♣ K and the ♦ K is on sides. If you feel 6C was specifically asking for the ♣K, you might take a shot at the grand .
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#10
Posted 2012-June-07, 16:28
Maybe it is a smolen type of hand.
I think I'm expected to assume that 5♦ includes a control in all suits when he seeks my opinion now, so he should have the ♥K.
6♣ should show the king.
♠AKxxxx, ♥Kxxx, -, ♣AKx?
♠AKxxxx, ♥Kxxxx, -, ♣AK?
♠AKxxxx, ♥Kxxx, -, ♣AKQ?
♠AKxxxx, ♥KQxx, -, ♣AKx?
I don't know how convincing these examples are. I try 6♦ and give up after 6♥. Whatever he has he should have a strong try for 7 for his bidding.
#11
Posted 2012-June-07, 16:37
Quote
This I think would bid direct grand.
Even opposite the worst possible hand: QJxx Axx KQJ Jxx which looks like the only 14 which doesn't guarantee 13 tricks the grand is very good and many very weak hands in the context like: QJxx AJx KQJ Jxx make it a laydown.
Quote
This is more convincing to me. I am generally happy to play a grand with key queen missing (they lead the suit sometimes and if they don't I will make in 60%+ of cases anyway) but maybe 6D is better bid than 7S if we expect to score well for 6S anyway.
#12
Posted 2012-June-07, 16:42

If partner had asked for kings, there would be no story.

Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#13
Posted 2012-June-08, 00:41
partner is asking for something else, third round club? he would have to have AKxxxx KQxx - AKx But then he doesn't need third round control, ♦A is just as good, at worse he would need a diamond finese if partner has the worst QJxx AJx KQxx Jxx , no, partner wouldn't risk an undiscussed 6♣ with that.
Partner must be seeking a heart card, and we do not cover it for a grand.
So I would bid 6♠ or maybe 6NT
#14
Posted 2012-June-08, 01:24
George Carlin
#15
Posted 2012-June-08, 01:53
Quote
Quote
Well, wouldn't he bid that with: AKxxxx Kxxx - AKx ?
The grand is good opposite this because:
a)they may lead a heart
b)they may lead a diamond
c)if they don't and we take inference from lack of red suit leads and spade suit split we will get Qh right quite often anyway.
#16
Posted 2012-June-08, 03:58
I would be unable to read anything from them not leading a red suit, leading dummy's void or side suit is awful.
#17
Posted 2012-June-08, 04:36
-- Bertrand Russell
#18
Posted 2012-June-08, 04:43
George Carlin
#19
Posted 2012-June-08, 05:15
EDIT: Now I take furher look, the above only gives you no club loser, for 13 tricks you need a little extra like good breaks or ♥Q or ♦A or ♦KQ and a finese.
#20
Posted 2012-June-08, 06:03
- hrothgar