Really - WHY?
Page 1 of 1
Why?
#1
Posted 2012-May-24, 21:04
Yehudit Hasin
"But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
"But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
#3
Posted 2012-May-24, 23:33
tx
Yehudit Hasin
"But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
"But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
#5
Posted 2012-May-25, 12:16
Asking why Robot doesn't want to defend with 5 trumps having already shown a good raise and partner declining, and the opps likely in 4-3 fit. They are supposed to make, on this hand, but it's better than going down 2 vul in 3h. At least that's what I assume. Although on the actual hand E/W misdefend and let 3h off the hook, so bidding actually worked better if this was MP.
- probably the "3+" spade should be removed from East, so that it's 3 spades exactly; 4 sp should bid 2s 100% over the cue bid IMO.
- make sure pass is one of the choices considered by North's balancing action simulation.
- probably the "3+" spade should be removed from East, so that it's 3 spades exactly; 4 sp should bid 2s 100% over the cue bid IMO.
- make sure pass is one of the choices considered by North's balancing action simulation.
#6
Posted 2012-May-26, 02:22
cloa513, on 2012-May-25, 03:36, said:
Why what in particular?
I thought it was obvious -why should the bot put partner in absolutely hopeless contract having Kxxxx in the ops likely 4-3 trump fit.....I mean i think that even GIB is able to understand that "+" is always better score than a "-"....
I am not sure though that 2♠ make, but this is irrelevant to the bid.
Yehudit Hasin
"But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
"But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
#7
Posted 2012-May-26, 04:59
Yu18772, on 2012-May-26, 02:22, said:
I thought it was obvious -why should the bot put partner in absolutely hopeless contract having Kxxxx in the ops likely 4-3 trump fit.....I mean i think that even GIB is able to understand that "+" is always better score than a "-"....
I am not sure though that 2♠ make, but this is irrelevant to the bid.
Yu
I am not sure though that 2♠ make, but this is irrelevant to the bid.
The actual is why is why partner put in such an awful overcall of only 4 working high card points playing with a GIB (who is like an unknowable partner- the internal logic of the programming is bizarre) which has a habit of pushing to get maximum value no matter how minor.
Thinking as GIB South has a void of spade and the king of clubs.
Page 1 of 1

Help
