BBO Discussion Forums: Weird bid by GIB - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Weird bid by GIB

#1 User is offline   fuburules3 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 232
  • Joined: 2010-April-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York

Posted 2012-March-03, 21:14

http://tinyurl.com/8xoy5tv

I was a little confused by what 4C was supposed to be.
0

#2 User is offline   G-Bear 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 2006-January-23

Posted 2012-March-04, 00:47

View Postfuburules3, on 2012-March-03, 21:14, said:

http://tinyurl.com/8xoy5tv

I was a little confused by what 4C was supposed to be.


A better question is why did it bid 2♠ with only a 4-card suit over your reverse. Why not bid 3NT, take a preference to 3♦ or cue-bid clubs if it wouldn't bid NT?

I would have taken the 4♣ bid to be showing a control in clubs, which it obviously didn't have.

Playing in 5♠ is a crime when the hand is cold for 6♦.
0

#3 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2012-March-04, 11:57

Why is the 3♠ bid limited to 17 or fewer HCP?
0

#4 User is offline   pigpenz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,554
  • Joined: 2005-April-25

Posted 2012-March-05, 09:56

after cue bidding then asking for aces with a void i might be confused about that 4NT call
somehow i doubt its exclusion blackwood
0

#5 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2012-March-05, 13:22

It appears to me that OP meant to bid an honest RKC, since he "knew" that North had ♣A, so he could include that in his count.
0

#6 User is offline   fuburules3 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 232
  • Joined: 2010-April-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New York

Posted 2012-March-05, 14:46

View PostBbradley62, on 2012-March-05, 13:22, said:

It appears to me that OP meant to bid an honest RKC, since he "knew" that North had ♣A, so he could include that in his count.


Yes, for better or worse, my intention was to bid slam if we had enough keycards (subtracting one from response due to A of clubs).

Perhaps if their were a forum to discuss bad/weird bids I make, my partners would post in it <_<
0

#7 User is offline   georgi 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 1,317
  • Joined: 2007-December-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Bulgaria

Posted 2012-March-08, 09:41

View Postfuburules3, on 2012-March-03, 21:14, said:

http://tinyurl.com/8xoy5tv

I was a little confused by what 4C was supposed to be.


2♠ is wrong here , which respectively lead to other bad choice after it simulated badly for 4♣ showing fake Ace. It will be fixed.

View PostG-Bear, on 2012-March-04, 00:47, said:

A better question is why did it bid 2♠ with only a 4-card suit over your reverse. Why not bid 3NT, take a preference to 3♦ or cue-bid clubs if it wouldn't bid NT?

I would have taken the 4♣ bid to be showing a control in clubs, which it obviously didn't have.

Playing in 5♠ is a crime when the hand is cold for 6♦.

For GIB 3NT is limited to 8-11HCP, so as GIB having 12HCP should pick initially 3♣ rebid 4SF as can't find other bid to give with no fit in opener's suits
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users