BBO Discussion Forums: South 100%? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

South 100%?

#1 User is online   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,289
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2012-February-12, 15:42


“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
0

#2 User is offline   quiddity 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,099
  • Joined: 2008-November-21

Posted 2012-February-12, 15:49

South's bidding seems fine to me. Why didn't North open 2♠?
Anyway, 5♥-X seems like the par contract (single-dummy) so what's the problem?
0

#3 User is offline   BunnyGo 

  • Lamentable Bunny
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,505
  • Joined: 2008-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, ME

Posted 2012-February-12, 15:49

What's the question? Why did North not open 2♠? Or does your title suggest that you think south should have bid 5♠ when it requires 2 finesses and 2-2 spades...
Bridge Personality: 44 44 43 34

Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
1

#4 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,071
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2012-February-12, 17:40


Seems like a better auction to me. And I agree that 5♥X seems like the par contract, single dummy.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#5 User is offline   HighLow21 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 781
  • Joined: 2012-January-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-February-12, 18:35

Agreed with all the comments so far. North's spade intermediates seem fine for a 2♠ opener, and I don't like the low-percentage 5♠ call.

Is the question: what is South's 100% line for defeating the contract?
There is a big difference between a good decision and a good result. Let's keep our posts about good decisions rather than "gotcha" results!
0

#6 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,412
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2012-February-12, 19:17

Nailed on 2♠ opener, I even prefer 1♠ to pass.

Shame you can't open (a natural) 1♣, as club lead and small diamond switch might net 800 which will render all talk of 5♠ moot.

Seriously though 5♥x is the only sensible place to be.

For 5♠ to make you need 2 of:

♣K onside.
♠2-2
♦ unable to be profitably led from either side (ie E has K, W has J) and you to read this correctly if a heart is led and a diamond returned, or a diamond lead to be missed by E at trick 1 when he doesn't have the K.

You are also straight off if spades are 4-0 even if everything else works.

Bizarrely you can make with the actual diamond layout with the K♣ wrong on a diamond lead, although you may need the x-ray goggles to be working well to do so. Fly the ace (observing the fall of the J), draw trumps and exit by running ♦8. Either a ruff and discard or club into the tenace disposes of one club loser and the 10♦ disposes of the other.
0

#7 User is offline   Cthulhu D 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,169
  • Joined: 2011-November-21
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:Overbidding

Posted 2012-February-12, 20:01

Yeah if partner didn't open 2S and then bid 4S and double(!), I'm going to assume he forgot to bid orginally. I'm pretty sure it's impossible for S to make the right decisions on the actual auction as it goes down because there is no rational holding for partner's bidding.

So 100% blame to north for psyching pass?
0

#8 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2012-February-12, 20:53

2S 4S sounds reasonable to me at this vulnerability. You would probably buy it with that. I would not futz around with a 2NT bid. Why did Nth not open 2S? Are you playing Acol two bids? As the bidding went, Sth's double is fine.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#9 User is online   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,289
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2012-February-12, 21:15

I wasn't considering norths pass here, I thought South was in a forcing pass situation and could have bid 5♠/5♥. I see now its not a FP.
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
SHAPE!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." (MH)
0

#10 User is offline   MickyB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,290
  • Joined: 2004-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2012-February-12, 21:29

4S is the only call over 2S. Rates to make a lot of the time and if it doesn't oppo might have 4H on, or phantom over 4S.
0

#11 User is offline   ahydra 

  • AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,840
  • Joined: 2009-September-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wellington, NZ

Posted 2012-February-13, 11:03

Supposing North does pass, why not open 1C? It's not like you mind rebidding that suit.

ahydra
0

#12 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2012-February-13, 11:35

View Postjillybean, on 2012-February-12, 21:15, said:

I wasn't considering norths pass here, I thought South was in a forcing pass situation and could have bid 5♠/5♥. I see now its not a FP.

Others may disagree, and I have to admit that North's bidding has me scratching my head, but given North's initial pass this is not a forcing pass situation.
0

#13 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2012-February-13, 12:48

I'm not sure why N didn't open 2♠ as this suit seems good enough even at these colors and 2♠ is indeed preemptive and a ♠ lead is likely desired.

Anyhow... on the given auction, South has a very clear pass after 5♥. People bid 5 over 5 too often, IMHO, and here 5♠ isn't a fav.

This is not a FP situation to me, after N's initial pass and S's 3rd seat opening.

As for South, while this is a matter of style, I clearly prefer to open 1♣. I want a ♣ lead if the opps buy it, which isn't unlikely with PD passed and I don't mind rebidding this good a 5 card suit.

.. neilkaz ..
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users