BBO Discussion Forums: Psychic 3NT opener (EBU) - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Psychic 3NT opener (EBU)

#21 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2011-May-06, 07:13

Does a solid suit with a single high card outside fall into the category "with high cards outside", "without high cards outside", both or neither?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#22 User is offline   VixTD 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,052
  • Joined: 2009-September-09

Posted 2011-May-06, 08:12

View Postgnasher, on 2011-May-06, 07:13, said:

Does a solid suit with a single high card outside fall into the category "with high cards outside", "without high cards outside", both or neither?

That was going to be my next question.
0

#23 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,456
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2011-May-06, 08:14

View Postgnasher, on 2011-May-06, 07:13, said:

Does a solid suit with a single high card outside fall into the category "with high cards outside", "without high cards outside", both or neither?

I presume we fall back on the introduction to the Laws: <snip> Finally, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise, the singular includes the plural and the masculine includes the feminine, and vice versa. <snip>.

But high cards outside does suggest more than one, and how high do they have to be? I get such bad cards that I regard a nine as high!
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#24 User is online   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,607
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2011-May-06, 13:55

It looks like a "traditional" gambling 3NT meets 11K2b) or c), with no need to go to 11K3. 11K3 gets us "Namyats 3NT" or "Kantar 3NT" ("unspecified 4m preempt, broken minor likely"), as well as many other things.

I don't know where the traditional Acol 3NT "18ish HCP, 8ish tricks, long minor with at least two other suits stopped" fits - 112Ka) as long as "semi-balanced" includes AKTxxx in a 2363 hand, but maybe 11K3d) catchall if it requires a minor.

I, too, would be checking what N/S agreement *is*, and why South bid that way with such an obviously non-agreement hand; and offer corrections as (if!) necessary.
When I go to sea, don't fear for me, Fear For The Storm -- Birdie and the Swansong (tSCoSI)
0

#25 User is offline   bluejak 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,686
  • Joined: 2007-August-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Liverpool, UK
  • Interests:Bridge Laws, Cats, Railways, Transport timetables

Posted 2011-May-12, 10:19

View Postgnasher, on 2011-May-06, 07:13, said:

Does a solid suit with a single high card outside fall into the category "with high cards outside", "without high cards outside", both or neither?

With
David Stevenson

Merseyside England UK
EBL TD
Currently at home
Visiting IBLF from time to time
<webjak666@gmail.com>
0

#26 User is offline   campboy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,347
  • Joined: 2009-July-21

Posted 2011-May-13, 16:53

OK, so my agreement currently is "a solid 7+card minor with no ace or king outside". Does this count as "without high cards outside"?
0

#27 User is offline   bluejak 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,686
  • Joined: 2007-August-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Liverpool, UK
  • Interests:Bridge Laws, Cats, Railways, Transport timetables

Posted 2011-May-17, 09:04

Yes
David Stevenson

Merseyside England UK
EBL TD
Currently at home
Visiting IBLF from time to time
<webjak666@gmail.com>
0

#28 User is online   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,607
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2011-May-17, 10:08

That's another "we all know it" thing that probably should be noted - "high cards" in descriptions of Gambling 3NT == "A or K". Because strangely enough - we don't all know it.

It's amazing how much we "know" that isn't actually written down. Bridge is a fascinating game.
(failing, spectacularly, to comment on LeftPondia at this time)
When I go to sea, don't fear for me, Fear For The Storm -- Birdie and the Swansong (tSCoSI)
0

#29 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2011-May-17, 18:24

View Postgnasher, on 2011-May-06, 07:13, said:

Does a solid suit with a single high card outside fall into the category "with high cards outside", "without high cards outside", both or neither?
In practice, IMO, it is understood to belong to the category with high cards outside. But of course, again, the wording should be clearer.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users