BBO Discussion Forums: Strong Jump Shift - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1

Strong Jump Shift

#1 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2010-December-18, 14:54

I open 1♣ and partner replies 2♦. The Express Full-Disclosure card says this shows 4+♦ and 17+points. When/why would you do this with only 4 diamonds?
0

#2 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,062
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2010-December-18, 15:51

I wouldn't, your partner was either a bot or an expert?
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
1

#3 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2010-December-19, 15:21

Jilly: I'm questioning the script presented by the full-disclosure convention card, not the action of my partner (who actually had a real diamond suit, as I would expect him to have).
0

#4 User is online   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,456
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2010-December-20, 10:03

Soloway jump shifts (don't know if this is what this CC is playing) are in three cases:

- single suited (diamonds), strong, basically willing to play opposite a singleton
- two suited, yours and partner's (C+D, here)
- hand too strong for immediate NT
but not "two-suiter not including opener's suit".

In cases 2 and 3, I can see a 4-card suit being bid; if you don't raise, partner will pattern out (NT with big balanced, anything else control bid with opener's suit).
"Do you hear it?" -- Molly Conger
0

#5 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2010-December-20, 13:29

So, 3343 and (23)44 hands with 17+ bid strong 2♦ instead of forcing 1♦? What is the advantage?
0

#6 User is offline   palabreur 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 30
  • Joined: 2011-March-09

Posted 2011-March-09, 10:33

View PostBbradley62, on 2010-December-20, 13:29, said:

So, 3343 and (23)44 hands with 17+ bid strong 2♦ instead of forcing 1♦? What is the advantage?


Not quite. Those hands are balanced, so they use a jump shift only if they are 18-19 hcp. 1C-2D shows either 18-19 bal, a strong hand with diamonds, or a strong hand with diamonds and clubs.

Why do we do this? So we can immediately start thinking about slam, without needing to jump later on. 1C-2D, now you know to evaluate your hand for slam. 18-19 balanced is relatively rare, so probably evaluate your hand based on a club or diamond slam.
0

Page 1 of 1


Fast Reply

  

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users