BBO Discussion Forums: Can either hand act vs multi? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Can either hand act vs multi? Premier League IV

#1 User is offline   MickyB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,290
  • Joined: 2004-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2010-September-12, 16:53

Scoring: IMP

2D-P-4H-P; 4S-AP. Apologies, I initially put that the oppo passed out 4H, this was not the case.

2D was a "bad" multi, 4H was pass-or-correct.

Your defence to a multi is X as 13-15 balanced or strong, bids are natural.

This post has been edited by MickyB: 2010-September-13, 06:01

0

#2 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-September-12, 17:11

Both hands have automatic passes imo. Well done opps I guess, if they do random stuff like this they will get you sometimes.
0

#3 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2010-September-12, 17:16

yeah all the 3 passes are auto.

Wether West told you all the info he had with his experience with this partner about the 4♥ call belongs to another forum.
0

#4 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2010-September-13, 00:43

WD Opps

Are you sure that your double is better in the long run as a take out double against spades?
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#5 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-September-13, 02:52

This demonstrates a weakness of the standard English defence to a Multi. If North could show a takeout double of spades on the first round, that would make it rather easy.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#6 User is offline   Simplicity 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 138
  • Joined: 2006-April-11

Posted 2010-September-13, 05:59

I seem to recall West did infact correct to spades? Not that i think it changes much...
0

#7 User is offline   MickyB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,290
  • Joined: 2004-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2010-September-13, 06:00

I've corrected the original post, apologies, the comments make more sense to me now :(
0

#8 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,178
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-September-13, 06:04

Hi,

now the auction makes sense.

Given that we have only 3 spades, I was assuming that the passing out of 4H
was the random bid, although why one would pass with a weak two in spades
was not clear.

As it is now, I still think, that North should pass, but he may make a borderline
T/O X, if North passes, than South will pass as well.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#9 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-September-13, 06:22

In the equivalent weak-two sequence at our table our opponents didn't seem to have any difficulty:
  2♠ pass 4♠ 5♦
  pass 6♦
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#10 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2010-September-13, 08:19

Codo and I would end up in 7♦, so there is no worries for this.
0

#11 User is offline   MickyB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,290
  • Joined: 2004-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, England

Posted 2010-September-15, 06:32

Teammates bid 2D-P-4D, which allowed East in with a double. One pair told me they didn't get in after the auction started 2D-P-4C "Transfer to your major", I would have thought both hands could have acted there!
0

#12 User is offline   lmilne 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 348
  • Joined: 2009-October-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney, Australia

Posted 2010-September-15, 21:30

Damn, the previous thread where someone psyched a pass or bid 4H with 4-1 in the majors was much more hilarious!
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users