This post has been edited by MickyB: 2010-September-13, 06:01
Page 1 of 1
Can either hand act vs multi? Premier League IV
#2
Posted 2010-September-12, 17:11
Both hands have automatic passes imo. Well done opps I guess, if they do random stuff like this they will get you sometimes.
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
#3
Posted 2010-September-12, 17:16
yeah all the 3 passes are auto.
Wether West told you all the info he had with his experience with this partner about the 4♥ call belongs to another forum.
Wether West told you all the info he had with his experience with this partner about the 4♥ call belongs to another forum.
#4
Posted 2010-September-13, 00:43
WD Opps
Are you sure that your double is better in the long run as a take out double against spades?
Are you sure that your double is better in the long run as a take out double against spades?
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#5
Posted 2010-September-13, 02:52
This demonstrates a weakness of the standard English defence to a Multi. If North could show a takeout double of spades on the first round, that would make it rather easy.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#6
Posted 2010-September-13, 05:59
I seem to recall West did infact correct to spades? Not that i think it changes much...
#7
Posted 2010-September-13, 06:00
I've corrected the original post, apologies, the comments make more sense to me now
#8
Posted 2010-September-13, 06:04
Hi,
now the auction makes sense.
Given that we have only 3 spades, I was assuming that the passing out of 4H
was the random bid, although why one would pass with a weak two in spades
was not clear.
As it is now, I still think, that North should pass, but he may make a borderline
T/O X, if North passes, than South will pass as well.
With kind regards
Marlowe
now the auction makes sense.
Given that we have only 3 spades, I was assuming that the passing out of 4H
was the random bid, although why one would pass with a weak two in spades
was not clear.
As it is now, I still think, that North should pass, but he may make a borderline
T/O X, if North passes, than South will pass as well.
With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#9
Posted 2010-September-13, 06:22
In the equivalent weak-two sequence at our table our opponents didn't seem to have any difficulty:
2♠ pass 4♠ 5♦
pass 6♦
2♠ pass 4♠ 5♦
pass 6♦
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#11
Posted 2010-September-15, 06:32
Teammates bid 2D-P-4D, which allowed East in with a double. One pair told me they didn't get in after the auction started 2D-P-4C "Transfer to your major", I would have thought both hands could have acted there!
#12
Posted 2010-September-15, 21:30
Damn, the previous thread where someone psyched a pass or bid 4H with 4-1 in the majors was much more hilarious!
Page 1 of 1

Help

2D-P-4H-P; 4S-AP. Apologies, I initially put that the oppo passed out 4H, this was not the case.
2D was a "bad" multi, 4H was pass-or-correct.
Your defence to a multi is X as 13-15 balanced or strong, bids are natural.