Preempted once again
#21
Posted 2010-February-16, 14:44
#22
Posted 2010-February-16, 14:51
#23
Posted 2010-February-16, 14:56
Playing transfer advances it's even funnier:
.....5♣ (shows diamonds or diam cue + spade fit)
5♦ 5♥ (heart cue, surely shows a spade fit now)
and it's up to pard now.
#24
Posted 2010-February-16, 15:28
#25
Posted 2010-February-17, 01:55
On this hand partner has AKxxxx K xx AKxx. The club is onside, it is not clear to me if you will get to 7S after 5H.
#26
Posted 2010-February-17, 02:19
#27
Posted 2010-February-17, 03:57
We didn't have agreements about 5NT being blackwood, and I'm not sure it would have helped.
#28
Posted 2010-February-17, 04:00
#29
Posted 2010-February-17, 10:05
Fluffy, on Feb 17 2010, 05:00 AM, said:
Singleton?
#30
Posted 2010-February-17, 15:11
If you 3 keep saying the contrary I will start thinking I am just biased b the actual hand again.
#31
Posted 2010-February-17, 15:34
#32
Posted 2010-February-17, 16:01
Fluffy, on Feb 17 2010, 09:11 PM, said:
If you 3 keep saying the contrary I will start thinking I am just biased b the actual hand again.
#33
Posted 2010-February-17, 16:47
Fluffy, on Feb 17 2010, 05:00 AM, said:
The only difference is this part occured before what I said, your comment that you quoted occured after what I said. But I admit I did not try to predict what you would say in the future when I made my comment, you got me on that.

Help
