Does it matter what you lead?
lead another great hand
#1
Posted 2009-August-20, 22:58
Does it matter what you lead?
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
#2
Posted 2009-August-20, 23:30
Here I would just lead partner's suit - even if clubs could be short. If I had an entry I would give more consideration to leading my own five-card suit.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#3
Posted 2009-August-21, 09:08
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#4
Posted 2009-August-21, 09:25
George Carlin
#5
Posted 2009-August-21, 10:35
Cascade, on Aug 20 2009, 10:30 PM, said:
I led a ♥ , opps made 3N+2, bottom board for us. Yes, I should lead a ♣ I dont have entires for my ♥'s.
Shouldn't declarer make +2 on any lead here?
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
#6
Posted 2009-August-21, 10:53
#7
Posted 2009-August-21, 11:13
#8
Posted 2009-August-25, 17:10
Although, I think most of the time when 1NT is overcalled over partner's minor opening, the opponents has an actual suit, and attacking it will either hurt the defence or else lose tempo if it were solid. This is kind of similar, he was just too strong to just overcall 1NT. I think if you have an ok alternative to leading the opened minor, you should take it (not that you really had one here).
#9
Posted 2009-August-25, 17:42
At IMPs I might be able to make by playing on diamonds when spades don't behave.
At MPs diamonds might set up more tricks although there is some risk but also see the reasoning for the line above for IMPs.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#10
Posted 2009-August-25, 23:20
Cascade, on Aug 25 2009, 06:42 PM, said:
lol
#11
Posted 2009-August-26, 00:02
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#12
Posted 2009-August-26, 00:28
#13
Posted 2009-August-26, 05:37
--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
#14
Posted 2009-August-26, 08:43
Stephen Tu, on Aug 26 2009, 01:28 AM, said:
In spite of the above LOL, this was my thought too, but playing on diamonds on diamonds is so all or nothing. I'm not sure I want to throw away my 35% board for a zero trying for 90%.
It does depend on the number of pairs in 4♠ and that's anyone's guess.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#15
Posted 2009-August-26, 12:38
Phil, on Aug 26 2009, 09:43 AM, said:
Stephen Tu, on Aug 26 2009, 01:28 AM, said:
In spite of the above LOL, this was my thought too, but playing on diamonds on diamonds is so all or nothing. I'm not sure I want to throw away my 35% board for a zero trying for 90%.
It does depend on the number of pairs in 4♠ and that's anyone's guess.
Where did my lol imply that playing for 11 tricks at MP was bad? As far as I know "any form of scoring" includes imps.
#16
Posted 2009-August-26, 13:13
Jlall, on Aug 26 2009, 01:38 PM, said:
Phil, on Aug 26 2009, 09:43 AM, said:
Stephen Tu, on Aug 26 2009, 01:28 AM, said:
In spite of the above LOL, this was my thought too, but playing on diamonds on diamonds is so all or nothing. I'm not sure I want to throw away my 35% board for a zero trying for 90%.
It does depend on the number of pairs in 4♠ and that's anyone's guess.
Where did my lol imply that playing for 11 tricks at MP was bad? As far as I know "any form of scoring" includes imps.
Sorry, thought you were referring to trying for 11 tricks at MPs.
Simply misread.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#17
Posted 2009-August-26, 13:29
Phil, on Aug 27 2009, 07:13 AM, said:
Jlall, on Aug 26 2009, 01:38 PM, said:
Phil, on Aug 26 2009, 09:43 AM, said:
Stephen Tu, on Aug 26 2009, 01:28 AM, said:
In spite of the above LOL, this was my thought too, but playing on diamonds on diamonds is so all or nothing. I'm not sure I want to throw away my 35% board for a zero trying for 90%.
It does depend on the number of pairs in 4♠ and that's anyone's guess.
Where did my lol imply that playing for 11 tricks at MP was bad? As far as I know "any form of scoring" includes imps.
Sorry, thought you were referring to trying for 11 tricks at MPs.
Simply misread.
At least I got that one right. LOL
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

Help

P (P) 1♣ (X)
P (2♦)P (3N)