Slam after their pre-empt
#3
Posted 2009-April-05, 08:14
Having passed, I'll cuebid 5♣. If partner bids 5♦, I'll drive slam.
#4
Posted 2009-April-05, 08:55
#5
Posted 2009-April-05, 09:17
#6
Posted 2009-April-05, 10:03
AnJoe, on Apr 5 2009, 03:55 PM, said:
Partner may well be worried about heart control. By bidding 5♦ he gives me the opportunity to show it. If he doesn't bid 5♦, he says that either he doesn't have diamond control or he's not interested in slam given that I passed over 3♥.
#7
Posted 2009-April-05, 10:50
#8
Posted 2009-April-05, 11:20
P P 3H P
4H 4S P 5C
means?
and what about
P P 3H P
4H 4S P 4NT
?
#9
Posted 2009-April-05, 12:10
Because I have good support and slam invitational hand with heart control I'm going to bid 5♥.
#10
Posted 2009-April-05, 12:39
For one thing partner might take it as asking for a ♥ control. For another, will partner know what he needs to bid a slam?
#11
Posted 2009-April-05, 13:19
EricK, on Apr 5 2009, 06:39 PM, said:
2. For another, will partner know what he needs to bid a slam?
1. Why? A raise to 5♠ is a more common bid to show ♥ worries. I would say 5♥ is positive unless otherwise agreed.
2. He should bid it if he has extras. That's the only thing that can be gauged at this stage.
#12
Posted 2009-April-05, 13:56
#13
Posted 2009-April-05, 14:24
whereagles, on Apr 5 2009, 07:19 PM, said:
EricK, on Apr 5 2009, 06:39 PM, said:
2. For another, will partner know what he needs to bid a slam?
1. Why? A raise to 5♠ is a more common bid to show ♥ worries. I would say 5♥ is positive unless otherwise agreed.
2. He should bid it if he has extras. That's the only thing that can be gauged at this stage.
I am worried that partner will say to himself something like "Can that be a cue-bid? If so, why did he cue ♥ and not ♣ or ♦? Has he only got a ♥ control? In that case my ♣ don't look at all promising. Maybe it isn't a cue though - perhaps he is asking about ♥. But doesn't 5♠ that? Or does 5♠ asking for good trumps? Well I have fairly good trumps, but no ♥ control. Or maybe it asks if I have extras. Well I still don't like my ♣. Hmmm I have no idea what to do, and there might be bad breaks around. I'll bid 5♠"
In short, I would be shocked if, after 5♥, partner did anything other than bid 5♠ - in which case we might as well pass 4♠.
#14
Posted 2009-April-05, 14:37
AKxxx
xxx
AKJx
x
will think "hum.. maybe pard has a really big bunch of clubs, say KQJ 7th and prefers to play there. I'll pass."
Maybe 5♥ isn't 100% clear as to controls, but at least it certainly shows some spades.
#15
Posted 2009-April-05, 14:42
EricK, on Apr 5 2009, 03:24 PM, said:
whereagles, on Apr 5 2009, 07:19 PM, said:
EricK, on Apr 5 2009, 06:39 PM, said:
2. For another, will partner know what he needs to bid a slam?
1. Why? A raise to 5♠ is a more common bid to show ♥ worries. I would say 5♥ is positive unless otherwise agreed.
2. He should bid it if he has extras. That's the only thing that can be gauged at this stage.
I am worried that partner will say to himself something like "Can that be a cue-bid? If so, why did he cue ♥ and not ♣ or ♦? Has he only got a ♥ control? In that case my ♣ don't look at all promising. Maybe it isn't a cue though - perhaps he is asking about ♥. But doesn't 5♠ that? Or does 5♠ asking for good trumps? Well I have fairly good trumps, but no ♥ control. Or maybe it asks if I have extras. Well I still don't like my ♣. Hmmm I have no idea what to do, and there might be bad breaks around. I'll bid 5♠"
In short, I would be shocked if, after 5♥, partner did anything other than bid 5♠ - in which case we might as well pass 4♠.
Come on. Looking at ♠AK, do you really think partner will think that we are moving towards slam missing two top trumps and all minor controls? Looking at ♠AK, do you really think partner will think we are just asking about a heart control when we are also missing the top two trumps?
Partner will take 5♥ as a slam invitation with a heart control. It's not the best bid since 5♣ is better, but clearly partner will be able to bid 6 some of the time.
#16
Posted 2009-April-05, 19:47
shevek, on Apr 5 2009, 08:28 AM, said:
3♥ - no
4♥ - 4♠ - no - ?
pass, hoping for plus.
#17
Posted 2009-April-05, 20:47
Would definitely NOT have overcalled.
#18
Posted 2009-April-06, 00:59

Help

3♥ - no
4♥ - 4♠ - no - ?