BBO Discussion Forums: Covering the other table in "invisible" mode - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Covering the other table in "invisible" mode provides several advantages

#1 User is offline   mrdct 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,448
  • Joined: 2003-October-27
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Moama, NSW

Posted 2004-April-22, 17:51

For two of the segments of a vugraph presentation I recently ran, I had a second operator in the closed room covering the action in "invisible" mode. The procedure I followed was (and thanks to Uday for his last minute advice on how to do this):

1. Load the .dup file in the usual way in the open room, but specifiy that coverage is only for the open room ("O").

2. Login to BBO as a vugraph operator in the open room and start the presentation.

3. Once the open room coverage has commenced, have the second vugraph operator login in "invisible" mode and go into the vugraph theatre and click on the open room presentation that has just started. The second operator will then be prompted to commence coverage of the closed room.

Doing the coverage in this way had the following advantages:

1. The second operator (who was a trainee) could practice without the presure of people watching, with the initial focus mainly on getting the auction, lead and claim right.

2. Closed room comparisons automatically came through to the open room without the open room operator needing to manually enter any closed room data.

3. Reduced load on the BBO servers as spectators wont be going back and forth between the two rooms.

4. Reduced commentator requirements as only one room needs commentators, but commentators are still able to review what has happened in the closed room through "Movie" and make comments as to why a contract failed or succeeded in the closed room.

5. The LIN files at the end of the match have a complete record of everything that happened in both rooms in a single file for each segment, completely eliminating the need for manual recorders in either room where required by the convening NCBO.
Disclaimer: The above post may be a half-baked sarcastic rant intended to stimulate discussion and it does not necessarily coincide with my own views on this topic.
I ♦ bidding the suit below the suit I'm actually showing not to be described as a "transfer" for the benefit of people unfamiliar with the concept of a transfer
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users