BBO Discussion Forums: 1x-1NT-Reverse-2NT - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1x-1NT-Reverse-2NT

#1 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,447
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2008-March-23, 06:21

1x-1NT-Reverse-2NT
eg: 1-1NT-2-2NT
(Suppose you agreed that 1x-1y-reverse-2NT is Lebensohl. )
How do you play 2NT here? Do you prefer to play it as weak to be able to stop on 3-level or do you prefer to play it as natural to be able to stop in 2NT?
0

#2 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-March-23, 06:22

Lebensohl.
0

#3 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2008-March-23, 06:53

Blackout
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#4 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-March-23, 07:16

LEB if REV is 2.

2 instead if 2 REV.

If 2 REV, Flags (2=, 2=) for strong preference/raise, 2NT NAT.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#5 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-March-23, 08:00

2NT cannot be passed for me. Strongly prefer 2S as the weak call here btw, don't understand why you wouldn't play that.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#6 User is offline   Cascade 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 6,772
  • Joined: 2003-July-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Juggling, Unicycling

Posted 2008-March-23, 13:22

Until recently we have played it as a minimum with a stopper.

Recently we adopted a new method.

Our non-standard method is:

After

1 1Maj
2

and

1 1
2

we play the first step is any minimum and does not show any extra strength. Every other bid is descriptive and game-forcing. Since the first step (2 or 2 does not show extra length we play it as forcing and do make the same bid on a hand with extra length and GF values but not suitable for a jump rebid which would always show a very good suit.
Wayne Burrows

I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

#7 User is offline   fred 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,611
  • Joined: 2003-February-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, USA

Posted 2008-March-23, 15:08

I think this is smart to play natural here:

- 2S "cuebid" in support of diamonds (ok that isn't quite natural)
- 2NT natural and non-forcing but rarely passed. Shows a minimum with cards in the unbid suits and a notrump-oriented hand.
- 3C 6+ clubs non-forcing
- 3D non-forcing
- 3H typically 3 hearts to an honor and a good hand for diamonds
- 3NT maximum with cards in the unbid suits and a notrump-oriented hand

IMO "normal" reverse considerations (where something like Lebensohl is important) do not apply here because:

- 1NT has limited responder's hand
- Slam is very unlikely
- Over 1NT response it is attractive for opener to "shade" a reverse with a hand that would only be worth 2D had the response been 1S (say a 1462 14-count).

Please note this is not my usual tirade against science. I am a big believer in science after a "normal" reverse like 1D-1S-2H, but different considerations apply here.

Fred Gitelman
Bridge Base Inc.
www.bridgebase.com
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users