BBO Discussion Forums: Apocalypse now - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Apocalypse now It's a sign of the (end) times...

#1 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-July-04, 05:20

Ultimate victory of the Saxe-Cobourg lineage....

George Walker Busche

6 6 6


The establishment of the NWO (Nobody Will Object) will allow the elite to enslave the rest. It's only a matter of time...
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#2 User is offline   scoob 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 344
  • Joined: 2003-February-14
  • Location:calgary, ab (canada)

Posted 2007-July-04, 06:33

Posted Image
0

#3 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-July-04, 10:49

Hi Scoob

Yes there are several more "puppets" even "Big Dick" is just a bigger puppet... :D
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#4 User is offline   DrTodd13 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,156
  • Joined: 2003-July-03
  • Location:Portland, Oregon

Posted 2007-July-04, 12:17

Suddenly I've started to hear a bit of chatter suggesting that Bush will refuse to leave office in 2009. In the past couple of years there has been a few laws and executive orders that basically say that the president can declare a military dictatorship in time of catastrophe or civil unrest. Is anybody else hearing increasing chatter about this possibility? What is the probability that an event, real or manufactured, will happen between now and Jan 2009 that will provide him an excuse to stay in office?
0

#5 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-July-04, 13:17

How does 100% sound? Not that good, right? The only question is who will be the president elect. If it is one of "theirs" then np, but should it be a popular choice (despite their attempts to place "rigged" polling stations, the general vote is normally unassailable (for now)) then a sudden "terrorist" attack will undoubtedly materialize.. :D .
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#6 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-July-04, 13:19

Just a quick "constitutional" question. Here in Canada, on election night, the winner is declared and the incumbent (when the loser) is divested of his powers. Why in the U.S. do they get more than 2 months to plan something?
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#7 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-July-04, 22:52

Al_U_Card, on Jul 4 2007, 02:19 PM, said:

Just a quick "constitutional" question. Here in Canada, on election night, the winner is declared and the incumbent (when the loser) is divested of his powers. Why in the U.S. do they get more than 2 months to plan something?

Because in the U.S. in the late 18th century, it took up to 6 weeks to count the ballots (December 20th was the cut-off date) and another month to have the new guy move his stuff in.

Canada was populated only by polar bears and Innuits until 1920, when they had cars and stuff.
0

#8 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-July-05, 05:29

Oh yeah, I forgot......that the US is still stuck in its distant past..... :)
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#9 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-July-05, 09:39

Al_U_Card, on Jul 5 2007, 06:29 AM, said:

Oh yeah, I forgot......that the US is still stuck in its distant past..... :)

Yeah, since it's been 7 whole years since it took us six weeks to count the ballots...
0

#10 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-July-05, 13:18

Well, I wasn't specifically referring to the attempts at subterfuge, but if you insist...
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#11 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-July-05, 13:25

Al_U_Card, on Jul 5 2007, 02:18 PM, said:

Well, I wasn't specifically referring to the attempts at subterfuge, but if you insist...

That wasn't a comment directed at you, that was a comment directed at how far we've come in 200 years. Or not.

Sorry.
0

#12 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-July-05, 15:00

Hi JT, not badly taken at all. We are exchanging ideas and concepts here and only those. :D
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

#13 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,102
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-July-05, 15:34

Al_U_Card, on Jul 4 2007, 02:19 PM, said:

Just a quick "constitutional" question.  Here in Canada, on election night, the winner is declared and the incumbent (when the loser) is divested of his powers.  Why in the U.S. do they get more than 2 months to plan something?

Well at least we tend to have voting. I missed when did the people of the UK vote Blair out and Brown in? I missed that. :D

It seems the Old Boys in the smoke filled back rooms just got together and said who gets to rule?
0

#14 User is offline   Al_U_Card 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,080
  • Joined: 2005-May-16
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-July-05, 17:57

Well, since they all have "handlers" it comes to the same thing (like Canada, we elect a party and platform as well as individuals and the "Prime" minister is one among many).

Not so sure that the office of the VICE-president will ever be the same again... :D
The Grand Design, reflected in the face of Chaos...it's a fluke!
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users