When first reading this thread I thought "wtp? North has six hearts and made a somewhat aggressive call. So be it. South bid as though north had a little something, so it is not like it was fielded."
However, I guess it brings up a point about how weak a bid should be before one deems it should be alerted. For example, suppose north had held: xx xxxxx xxx xxx and made the same 2
♥ overcall. Now this is fine and perfectly legal, but does your S.O. require it to be alerted? To answer that question we must first ask if this pair has an *agreement* to play such light overcalls. If they do have an agreement, then we have to look at your SO's regulations. Here are the two regs I am familiar with:
ACBL Alert Procedure said:
Most natural calls do not require Alerts. If the call promises about the expected strength and shape, no Alert is necessary. Treatments that show unusual strength or shape should be Alerted.
EBU Orange Book said:
5 E 1 Passes and bids
Unless it is announceable (see 5 C and 5 D), a pass or bid must be alerted if
(a ) It is not natural; or
(b ) It is natural but has a potentially unexpected meaning.
So, there are two questions. 1) Do this pair have an agreement? and 2) If so, do we judge that this 2
♥ call has "unusual strength or shape" or a "potentially unexpected meaning"?
My opinion on the 2nd question is that although it's aggressive, I would not judge this particular 2
♥ bid to be so unusual that I would require an alert. I obviously cannot answer the first question without fact finding.