FD - defense to same bid but different meaning

BBO Discussion Forums: FD - defense to same bid but different meaning - BBO Discussion Forums

Page 1 of 1

You cannot start a new topic
Add Reply

FD - defense to same bid but different meaning

#1 DJNeill

Group: Full Members
Posts: 455
Joined: 2003-September-07
Gender:Male
Location:Hillsboro, OR USA
Interests:current events, long-distance cycling

Posted 2006-February-23, 13:24

Hi all,
What's the best way currently to fill out two different defenses to weak and strong NT's. in FD? Do you do something with the "Qualify" field of an enemy opening 1N?

Thanks,
Dan

Back to top of the page up there ^
MultiQuote
Reply

#2 csdenmark

Group: Advanced Members
Posts: 1,422
Joined: 2003-February-13

Posted 2006-February-23, 13:48

DJNeill, on Feb 23 2006, 09:24 PM, said:

Hi all,
What's the best way currently to fill out two different defenses to weak and strong NT's. in FD? Do you do something with the "Qualify" field of an enemy opening 1N?

Thanks,
Dan

I have asked for that too but received no answer so far.

As it is here there are bugs in default cards from BBO it is impossible to look and learn from there. I think you are right it is syntax for qualify field we need some info about.

Right now it looks so that the string with empty qualify field is loaded each time. No matter what I have tried(range, symbol or some logic combinations) nothing seems to be right.

Maybe that also will be able to affect in offensive. I have 14 strings for opening 3 features in Meckwell. Such are heading for bugs I think, at least bugs are difficult to correct.