Much as I'd like to claim that I'd bid 3N (and then partner can bid 4N over the 4
♥) the reality is that I'd bid a pedestrian 5
♣ over 2
♦: I think that the standard approach is that one does not preempt over a preempt, so this is a good 'to play' bid. However, the ambiguity of the 2
♦ bid plus the extreme nature of the jump may invalidate this assumption.
In any event, I am going to find myself in 5
♣.
In both 5 and 6
♣, I run my trump.
By the time I have played 7 of them, I probably have a good idea of whether East held 5
♥. If he did not, then he has the weak variety. (Of course, had I given West a chance to bid 4
♥, I'd have a big clue already: he might well have bid
♠ with 4=3 in the majors and might not have bid at all with a weak hand and that shape)
All depends on what is going on, but I suspect that it will seem like a good idea to play my last trump, reducing dummy to stiff
♠ and AQJ of
♦ and my hand to Kx
♠ and x x in the reds.
In my perfect world, the
♦K is onside and I now take the
♦ finesse.
At that point, I am either down or at a crossroads. If the
♠A is onside, I can pitch my small
♥ and lead a
♠. If the
♠A is offside, it is either stiff (I exit a
♠ and make West lead from Kx
♦) or doubleton (I cash the
♦A and drop the King)
I strongly suspect that I will have a very good idea as to the ending, but cannot announce my line without being at the table. The pretty play is to exit the
♠
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari